nhuphuzz Admin


Tổng số bài gửi : 432 Points : 14598 Reputation : 17 Join date : 18/10/2010
 | Tiêu đề: How Can This Be True, Math Nerds? 04/12/11, 02:53 pm | |
| How Can This Be True, Math Nerds?[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]How Can This Be True - Answer 1. For both of the pictures to be exactly the same, they must both have the same area AND each of the pictures must have same area as the area of the "PERFECT" triangle (oh no - shades of dreaded Math come to mind!) ... Here are the calculated areas 4U:
Hint: the area of a triangle = (1/2)b.h where b is the base and h is the height
1A. Before looking at either picture, calculate what the area of this picture would be if it was a PERFECT triangle (i.e. 13 X 5 squares) Area = (1/2)b.h = (1/2)(13)(5) = 65/2 = 32 + 1/2
1B. Area of the top picture Area = 1 + 2 + 3 + 4
= (1/2)(5)(2) + 1/2(8)(3) + 7 + 8 = 5 + 12 + 7 + 8 = 32
1C. Area of the lower picture Area = 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 = (1/2)(5)(2) + (1/2)(8)(3) + 7 + 8 + 1 = 5 + 12 + 7 + 8 + 1 = 33
Neither of the two pictures form a perfect triangle, but both of them look very close to the outline of a perfect triangle!
2. Compare the slopes of the triangles and you realize that the hypotenuse of the overall triangle is not a straight line ...
Hint: the slope of a line = rise / run (the slope of a horizontal line is zero)
2A. Slope of the PERFECT triangle Slope = rise / run = 5 / 13 = 0.384615
2B. Slope of Triangle 1 (in both pictures) Slope = rise / run = 2 / 5 = 0.4
2C. Slope of Triangle 2 (in both pictures) Slope = rise / run = 3 / 8 = 0.375
Prove it by blowing up the images and running a ruler along the hypotenuse of both triangles - both are not a perfect line (but close!)
3. The bottom triangle has ~181.2 degrees when by definition a triangle must have only 180 degrees. I used the inverse tangent function and applied it to both angles that were not right angles. I calculated both what the angles should be based on the lengths of the whole triangle at the bottom and what they actually were based on the smaller triangles that formed the angles. The top right angle of the bottom triangle should be ~68.96 degrees based on tan^-1(13/5) but when you input the lengths of the smaller angle into this formula (tan^-1(8/3)) the angle comes out to be 69.44 degrees. Likewise with the other angle it should be ~21.04 degrees and actually is ~21.8. Larger angles mean more area into the shape.
Conclusion: the 2 objects are NOT triangles (even though they at first appear so!) and they have different areas... Thanks to Paul Stafford, Eric Nelson, Roy Bishop & freeclimber!
Được sửa bởi nhuphuzz ngày 04/12/11, 02:59 pm; sửa lần 1. | |
|
nhuphuzz Admin


Tổng số bài gửi : 432 Points : 14598 Reputation : 17 Join date : 18/10/2010
 | Tiêu đề: Re: How Can This Be True, Math Nerds? 04/12/11, 02:55 pm | |
| This answer is very clear, right? | |
|